Re: Should vim-X11 conflict with vim-enhanced ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 15/01/2008, Michał Bentkowski <mr.ecik@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 15-01-08, Till Maas <opensource@xxxxxxxxx> napisał(a):
> > Alternatives (man alternatives) can be used for this, there is no need to
> > write a wrapper. Still the question why someone would want to run vim from
> > the vim-enhanced package if vim-X11 is also installed is not answered.
>
> But it's possible that someone might like to do so. We shouldn't force
> anybody to do anything. If someone wants to have -X11 and -enhanced
> installed and use the second one - that's his business, he ought not
> be prevented from doing that.

Right - isn't this exactly the same situation as with emacs and
emacs-nox - there a wrapper script and alternatives is used.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux