Am Samstag, den 19.01.2008, 13:10 -0500 schrieb seth vidal: > On Sat, 2008-01-19 at 19:08 +0100, nodata wrote: > > > Apart from security bugs, I have never had a bug fixed in Ubuntu, ever. > > The tactic seems to be to wait until Debian fix it, or wait until Debian > > fix it and then ask you to upgrade to the next release. > > > > Fedora does a lot better, much better, but probably the most annoying > > aspect of using Fedora's bugzilla is the attitude of some of the > > maintainers (not all) and the "closing, report upstream" attitude. > > > > Closing a bug report with "report it upstream" is a let down. It's > > repetitive boring work that a computer should be doing. > > > > It takes a lot of effort to report a bug, and by this I mean that I know > > a *lot* of people who find a bug, and maybe a fix, but don't bug report > > it. They should be, but I can see why they don't. > > Hmm, is that what the 'upstream' close reason is for? Normally, I close > things 'upstream' when I have checked a fix into the upstream code base. > Which seems pretty reasonable time to close it to me. > > -sv > I'm talking about closing the bug and telling the reporter to report upstream, i.e. "go away". -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
