On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 08:30:44AM -0500, Daniel J Walsh wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Olivier Galibert wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 01:48:42PM -0500, Daniel J Walsh wrote: > >> <tunable name="allow_execmem" dftval="false"> > >> <desc> > >> <p> > >> Allow unconfined executables to map a memory region as both executable > >> and writable, this is dangerous and the executable should be reported in > >> bugzilla") > > > > That should be "to map a file in a memory region", as UD's page > > explains. Otherwise anyone who knows a little about dynamic > > recompilers/JITs is gonna go "huh?". > > > > OG. > > > Bad cut and paste. The one I pasted was for allow_execmem. Where the > definition is correct. You mean Ulrich's page is incorrect then? I indeed had noticed it was about execmem. > java/mono apps are not confined by this, since > they run under a different context. Java/Mono are not the only programs with dynamic code generators in them. OG. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
