On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 12:48:27PM -0500, Jon Stanley wrote: > On Jan 16, 2008 7:07 PM, Bastien Nocera <bnocera@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > IpSec and IPP as services don't sound very much like desktop > > applications. > > IPSec sounds reasonable since users may be using a VPN client in order > to access a corporate or remote network. If not enabled by default, > there needs to be something easy in s-c-firewall to enable it, since > making IPSec work is a non-trivial endeavor. In the 'server' profile, > though - it's absolute rubbish. If someone wants to run a VPN server, > they should know enough about it to configure the firewall > appropriately :) > I think you don't need open ports for VPN clients. State firewall should take care about such situation, doesn't? Adam -- Adam Tkac, Red Hat, Inc. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
