Douglas McClendon wrote:
Andrew Farris wrote:
Douglas McClendon wrote:
<rant>
I wish I could say that I'm sorry to crush your hopes, but I'm really
not. Despite what I've said in the past, I have the utmost respect
for selinux and security. But what I don't have any respect for is
people of your mind, who myopically just see "increased security".
People who view security that way IMO contribute to some of the worst
cancers against humanity.
This is just standard rhetoric that I shouldn't be wasting my time
repeating here, but security is ALWAYS a balance and a tradeoff
against other *values*, and never an absolute.
Sounds like politically charged nonsense, not rhetoric related to
computer security.
Guess you're no fan Bruce -
http://www.news.com/2010-7348-5204924.html
"
But that's only half of the equation; it's just as important to discuss
the costs. Security is always a trade-off, and herein lies the real
question: "Is this security countermeasure worth it?"
I was never debating this concept of cost-benefit tradeoff.
--
Andrew Farris <lordmorgul@xxxxxxxxx> <ajfarris@xxxxxxxxx>
gpg 0xC99B1DF3 fingerprint CDEC 6FAD BA27 40DF 707E A2E0 F0F6 E622 C99B 1DF3
No one now has, and no one will ever again get, the big picture. - Daniel Geer
---- ----
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
