Re: Fedora bug triage - workflow proposal

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Jan 16, 2008 12:00 PM, Emmanuel Seyman
<emmanuel.seyman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> How is it not feasible ?

Don't kill the messenger! :)  I've gotten word from the RH maintainer
that in the RH version of bugzilla (which as you know is nothing like
upstream), states cannot be defined per product.  There was an effort
to take out the UNCONFIMRED state, and all references to it.
Re-introducing it is a non-trivial task in the current codebase, and
even if it weren't, it would affect all products.   This summer, it
may be easier - but not now.  We've got to live with what we've got.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux