On 2008/1/15 Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Great. You might want to use (optional) > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/JesseKeating/FESCoProposalTemplateDraft > and write up a page for FESCo to refer to for this. Created at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/JonStanley/BugWorkflow > I'm not sure how usefull this will be. Maintainers pretty much ignore > priority now, as reporter (or any package maintainer) can set it...+ Yep, part of the proposal is to change that - it's not mentioned in the proposal page since the current process of blocker bugs seems to work. Maybe not the most efficient thing in the world, but if it ain't broke.... > What about the above case of NEEDINFO(maintainer)? Great question, I've never seen this actually used. Most of the time it's in NEEDINFO(reporter). I guess some logic could be used, I'm not sure of the how good tag support is in the XMLRPC API. Maybe someone smarter than me could comment. > I think this is great! ;) > I'd be happy to help with triage... We need all the help that we can get. Make sure to tell all your friends :) -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
