Re: rpms/sepostgresql/devel postgresql-8.2.6.tar.gz, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.4, 1.5 sepostgresql.init, 1.8, 1.9 sepostgresql.spec, 1.8, 1.9 sepostgresql.te, 1.8, 1.9

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Tom Lane wrote:
> BTW, I'm planning to push postgresql 8.3 into rawhide very soon (actually
> it'll likely be 8.3RC2 at first, just to make sure it gets in there
> before F9 alpha freeze).  Don't know what impact that will have on
> sepostgresql.  If you won't be ready to update, it might be necessary
> to decouple the two packages after all.
> 
> 			regards, tom lane

I've ported sepostgresql features into 8.3 based postgresql for a while.
See, http://sepgsql.googlecode.com/svn/ .
"/trunk" is already designed for 8.3RC1 based sepostgresql.
There will be an impact indeed, but it's not a negative one.

On the 8.3 based sepostgresql, it stores security attribute of HeapTuple
using the t_hoff padding area as you suggested at:
  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249522#c58

This is a reson why we cannot share any *.so libraries, as is.
However, I believe this change enables to share most of contrib packages
without any changing/rebuilding.

Thanks,
-- 
OSS Platform Development Division, NEC
KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux