Jon Stanley (jonstanley@xxxxxxxxx) said: > On Jan 15, 2008 4:21 PM, Matthew Saltzman <mjs@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > (I'm usually just a lurker on discussions like this, but I couldn't > > resist.) > > > > NEW -> CONFIRMED -> ASSIGNED ? > > Got some word on this off-list - it is a non-trivial endeavor to add > states, it adds nothing to the workflow. Let's not get into a > discussion here whereby we're arguing over what color the bike shed > is...to quote: I know the story. I still think telling the user their bug is ASSIGNED when it still may be completely ignored is bad form. The developers are generally more adaptable than the users filing the bugs - things like UNCONFIRMED, NEW, ASSIGNED are all easily understandable. ON_QA, ON_DEV are not. (Also, the prior states are all in *upstream* bugzilla, as opposed to RH inventions - if we use those, we'll have common states across bugzillas.) Bill -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
