I didnt understand what is the 4 th software written in message 7 and 8 thank you On Tue, 2008-01-15 at 12:00 -0500, fedora-devel-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > Send fedora-devel-list mailing list submissions to > fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > fedora-devel-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx > > You can reach the person managing the list at > fedora-devel-list-owner@xxxxxxxxxx > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of fedora-devel-list digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: Fedora bug triage - workflow proposal (Ralf Corsepius) > 2. Re: texlive + pdftex +kile: very slow (Stefan Grosse) > 3. Re: Fedora bug triage - workflow proposal (Kevin Fenzi) > 4. Re: anaconda - unhandled exception (Jeremy Katz) > 5. Re: compilation architecture (Jakub 'Livio' Rusinek) > 6. Re: texlive + pdftex +kile: very slow (Jos? Matos) > 7. Re: SpotLight into fedora (Zoltan Boszormenyi) > 8. Re: SpotLight into fedora (subhodip biswas) > 9. Where are the CD ISO's? (fwd) (Mike McGrath) > 10. Re: Where are the CD ISO's? (fwd) (subhodip biswas) > 11. Re: Where are the CD ISO's? (fwd) (Jesse Keating) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 12:25:00 +0100 > From: Ralf Corsepius <rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: Fedora bug triage - workflow proposal > To: Development discussions related to Fedora > <fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <1200396300.5174.158.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain > > > On Mon, 2008-01-14 at 23:46 -0500, Jon Stanley wrote: > > 2) Triage team looks at bug report, determines if dupe or > > insufficient information exists to solve it. If there is not enough > > information in the bug, then triage team puts the bug in NEEDINFO. As > > you will see below, this state has a finite life cycle associated with > > it. > I am having doubts the bug triage team will be able to judge on whether > a PR is legitimate or not but on trivial cases. > > I.e. I would expect them to end up spam essentially filtering. > > > 3) Assuming bug survives through the triage team, it changes state to > > ASSIGNED > > To whom? > > IMO, the real problem is getting a competent volunteer involved who is > likely sufficiently knowledgeable about a particular issue. i.e. to > communicate such issues, such that a volunteer can take action when _he_ > wants. > > That said, I consider lack of communication and "bug arbitration" to be > the actual flaw behind current bug tracking workflow in Fedora. > > Ralf > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 17:12:24 +0100 > From: Stefan Grosse <singularitaet@xxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: texlive + pdftex +kile: very slow > To: Development discussions related to Fedora > <fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <200801151712.24830.singularitaet@xxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > On Tuesday 15 January 2008 04:15:58 pm Jos Matos wrote: > JM> No problem here both on fc8 with Jindich texlive packages and lyx as > well > JM> as with rawhide. > JM> > JM> It runs fast and I do not notice any difference from tetex in terms of > JM> speed. > > Thanks, so it seems a problem with kile? > > Stefan > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 09:24:52 -0700 > From: Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: Fedora bug triage - workflow proposal > To: fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx > Message-ID: <20080115092452.245d5604@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 23:46:36 -0500 > jonstanley@xxxxxxxxx ("Jon Stanley") wrote: > > > Well, it was a great session at FUDCon. A lot came out of it, and I'm > > going to put some of them down here. The work flow suggested below I'd > > a FESco vote on, since it really affects you guys. > > Great. You might want to use (optional) > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/JesseKeating/FESCoProposalTemplateDraft > and write up a page for FESCo to refer to for this. > > > This work flow was > > discussed between myself, John Poelstra, and Will Woods at the Sunday > > hackfest, and we agree that this is the correct way to move forward, > > however, we want community input and buy-in on this, since it has > > pretty far-reaching consequences. > > Sorry I couldn't make it on sunday... had to catch a plane. ;) > > > Here is the lifecycle of a bug: > > ...snipp... > Looks great to me. > > > Note that at any step of the above process, the maintainer can "fast > > track" the bug, and change it to ASSIGNED. The triage team is not > > going to look at bugs that are not in NEW or NEEDINFO state. On the > > What if the bug is put in NEEDINFO(maintainer) by the reporter? > Ie, they have provided info or need to ask the maintainer about > something, but the maintainer isn't responding? Are those closed? > They probibly shouldn't be... > > > flip side of that, it is not a maintainer's responsibility to look at > > bugs that are in NEW any longer. They can focus their energy on the > > bugs that are ASSIGNED to them. > > > > Also, maintainers should not be allowed to set priority on bugs. > > Setting severity is fine. Only QA or releng should set priorities. > > This allows us to look at things in a sane manner (which is impossible > > now since severity and priority fields come from /dev/urandom > > seemingly), and possibly lessen the reliance on blocker bugs (though > > blockers are useful in their own right, so don't think that we are > > going to eliminate them any time soon). > > I'm not sure how usefull this will be. Maintainers pretty much ignore > priority now, as reporter (or any package maintainer) can set it... > > > It was also decided that when a bug is in NEEDINFO for one month, it > > will be closed. Maintainers would need to realize that putting a bug > > in NEEDINFO is putting it on the fast track for closure. > > What about the above case of NEEDINFO(maintainer)? > > > I think that's all that I have to say on this topic right now, let me > > know if I'm missing anything or this is complete hogwash :) > > I think this is great! ;) > I'd be happy to help with triage... > > > -Jon > > kevin > > -------------- next part -------------- > A non-text attachment was scrubbed... > Name: signature.asc > Type: application/pgp-signature > Size: 189 bytes > Desc: not available > Url : https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20080115/804c8a2b/signature.bin > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 11:27:29 -0500 > From: Jeremy Katz <katzj@xxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: anaconda - unhandled exception > To: Development discussions related to Fedora > <fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <1200414449.3433.4.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain > > On Tue, 2008-01-15 at 08:45 -0500, Chris Lumens wrote: > > > Keep it up Jeremy, ya bout got it licked! > > > > Not to be a jerk or anything, but you're aware at least five other > > people work on anaconda, right? > > And I'm not even really around this month (other than sporadic looking > at email). Luckily, we've got a team of other rock stars these days[1] > helping out on anaconda these days and it doesn't all just fall to me > anymore. > > Jeremy > > [1] And have for a while at this point. Keep up Mike! :-) > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 5 > Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 17:31:04 +0100 > From: "Jakub 'Livio' Rusinek" <jakub.rusinek@xxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: compilation architecture > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > <fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: > <5e92ee3f0801150831t685810f1jb2ac41c7975a1675@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > Installing openSUSE again would complicate my life. Again. > But if it's so necessary, I can install it one more time. > > My hardware and configuration? > > http://www.smolts.org/show_all?UUID=c8dbb9d3-a9bd-4ba6-b92e-4a294ba5a95f > > -- > Jakub 'Livio' Rusinek > http://liviopl.jogger.pl/ > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20080115/df91a460/attachment.html > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 6 > Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 16:32:39 +0000 > From: Jos? Matos <jamatos@xxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: texlive + pdftex +kile: very slow > To: fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx > Message-ID: <200801151632.39422.jamatos@xxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > On Tuesday 15 January 2008 16:12:24 Stefan Grosse wrote: > > Thanks, so it seems a problem with kile? > > That seems strange, nevertheless try to run pdflatex from the command line > and see what is going on. I would expect kile to be not guilty here and the > command line will point where the problem is... > > > Stefan > > -- > Jos Ablio > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 7 > Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 17:41:24 +0100 > From: Zoltan Boszormenyi <zboszor@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: SpotLight into fedora > To: Development discussions related to Fedora > <fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <478CE234.3090901@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed > > Jakub 'Livio' Rusinek rta: > > Not the same. SIMILLIAR. > > Sure you meant "Silmarillion". > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 8 > Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 22:14:24 +0530 > From: "subhodip biswas" <subhodip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: SpotLight into fedora > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > <fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: > <539333cb0801150844o2e34bffcob66745345002b16f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > ah ... sorry i forgot to mention that .. thanx for reminding > > On Jan 15, 2008 10:11 PM, Zoltan Boszormenyi <zboszor@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Jakub 'Livio' Rusinek rta: > > > Not the same. SIMILLIAR. > > > > Sure you meant "Silmarillion". > > > > > > > > -- > > > > fedora-devel-list mailing list > > fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list > > > > > > -- > Regards > Subhodip Biswas > > GPG key : FAEA34AB > Server : pgp.mit.edu > http://subhodipbiswas.wordpress.com > http:/www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/SubhodipBiswas > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 9 > Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 10:47:38 -0600 (CST) > From: Mike McGrath <mmcgrath@xxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Where are the CD ISO's? (fwd) > To: fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx > Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.00.0801151047230.2987@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII > > What are the plans for media support for Fedora 9? > > -Mike > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 10:32:33 +0100 > From: Heinrich Winther Christensen <hwc@xxxxxx> > To: webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Where are the CD ISO's? > > Hi... > > My old but useful server doesn't have DVD, so I desperately need ISO's > for CD's. > Where will I find them? > > Heinrich > > -- > Fedora-websites-list mailing list > Fedora-websites-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-websites-list > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 10 > Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 22:23:21 +0530 > From: "subhodip biswas" <subhodip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: Where are the CD ISO's? (fwd) > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > <fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: > <539333cb0801150853j6f417db2q4027fffbf54e93d3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > Yeah .. this is a good issue .. many of fedora user here stick to > older version because cd iso in unavailable .... and live cd does not > serve their purpose .. > > > -- > Regards > Subhodip Biswas > > GPG key : FAEA34AB > Server : pgp.mit.edu > http://subhodipbiswas.wordpress.com > http:/www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/SubhodipBiswas > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 11 > Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 11:53:15 -0500 > From: Jesse Keating <jkeating@xxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: Where are the CD ISO's? (fwd) > To: fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx > Message-ID: <20080115115315.0307581e@xxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > On Tue, 15 Jan 2008 10:47:38 -0600 (CST) > Mike McGrath <mmcgrath@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > What are the plans for media support for Fedora 9? > > Generating split media as part of the official compose process. Alpha > will see DVD + split CD media. > > -- > Jesse Keating > Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours? > -------------- next part -------------- > A non-text attachment was scrubbed... > Name: signature.asc > Type: application/pgp-signature > Size: 189 bytes > Desc: not available > Url : https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20080115/55daba84/signature.bin > > ------------------------------ > > -- > fedora-devel-list mailing list > fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list > > End of fedora-devel-list Digest, Vol 47, Issue 105 > ************************************************** -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
