Re: Should vim-X11 conflict with vim-enhanced ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Development discussions related to Fedora <fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Should vim-X11 conflict with vim-enhanced ?
From: Bill Nottingham <notting@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 13:53:57 -0500
In-reply-to: <1c252d490801150943q677a6be3n3b48e442edd1697@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Mail-followup-to: Development discussions related to Fedora <fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Development discussions related to Fedora <fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)

Joachim Frieben (joachim.frieben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) said: 
>  vim-X11 has a lot more dependencies than vim-enhanced, in particular on
> GNOME.

vim-X11 has no gnome dependencies.

GTK != GNOME, just as QT != KDE.

Bill

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Should vim-X11 conflict with vim-enhanced ?
  - From: Joachim Frieben
- Re: Should vim-X11 conflict with vim-enhanced ?
  - From: Casey Dahlin

References:
- Should vim-X11 conflict with vim-enhanced ?
  - From: Karsten Hopp
- Re: Should vim-X11 conflict with vim-enhanced ?
  - From: Michał Bentkowski
- Re: Should vim-X11 conflict with vim-enhanced ?
  - From: Till Maas
- Re: Should vim-X11 conflict with vim-enhanced ?
  - From: Joachim Frieben

Prev by Date: Re: texlive + pdftex +kile: very slow
Next by Date: Re: Fedora bug triage - workflow proposal
Previous by thread: Re: Should vim-X11 conflict with vim-enhanced ?
Next by thread: Re: Should vim-X11 conflict with vim-enhanced ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Fedora Announce] [Fedora Kernel] [Fedora Testing] [Fedora Formulas] [Fedora PHP Devel] [Kernel Development] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Maintainers] [Fedora Desktop] [PAM] [Red Hat Development] [Gimp] [Yosemite News]