Re: Fedora bug triage - workflow proposal

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 03:42:09PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Patrice Dumas wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 11:46:36PM -0500, Jon Stanley wrote:
>>> It was also decided that when a bug is in NEEDINFO for one month, it
>>> will be closed.  Maintainers would need to realize that putting a bug
>>> in NEEDINFO is putting it on the fast track for closure.
>>
>> So what is the equivalent of NEEDINFO that doesn't put the bug on tracks
>> for closing?
>
> Can you explain why you need that? That information would be useful to 
> determine a good workflow.

When I have a look at a number of bugs (for example my bugs) it allows
for me to know which ones I don't have to care about since they are in
wait for somebody to move.

--
Pat

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux