On Thu, 10.01.08 22:07, Warren Togami (wtogami@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > Does upgrading from 0.9.7 to 0.9.8 break library ABI with applications > already linked against any pulseaudio library? If not, we should really > explore the possibility of upgrading to a newer pulseaudio version in > Fedora 8. ABI is stable in all 0.9.x versions. > Later when the test users agree that the pulseaudio package in your test > repository is seemingly good, it can be pushed to F8's updates-testing > repository where many thousands of other users who opt-in to that optional > channel will be exposed to it. It can be tested there for a while before > pushing to the public in the stable updates channel. This multi-layered > approach to testing should ensure that the update is of higher quality than > the current F8 pulseaudio. > > Pulseaudio made many applications that used to be stable suddenly > unreliable. Apps like pidgin, mplayer, xine, Adobe Flash Player and > many Uh, don't get me started on Flash. > more now have weird pulseaudio related crash issues. There is a desire to > pull in newer pulseaudio versions if bugs are fixed to make it more stable. > > Please let us explore the feasibility of upgrading it in F8? I will put a copy of 0.9.8 in updates-testing. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering Red Hat, Inc. lennart [at] poettering [dot] net ICQ# 11060553 http://0pointer.net/lennart/ GnuPG 0x1A015CC4 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
