Re: Linux is not about choice [was Re: Fedora too cutting edge?]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Arthur Pemberton wrote:
On Jan 11, 2008 2:30 PM, Les Mikesell <lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
It doesn't seem as sensible as being able to plug into a known
controller position and get a known device name, particularly in the
scenario where the drives aren't hot-plug and you want to access a bunch
of new ones after a reboot and know which is which.


Frankly i like this idea, but I'm unsure of the practicality of it:

What is the highest level which is even aware of the physical location
of said device? I would imagine the BIOS knows, and maybe some really
low level kernel modules but anything above that?

The bios doesn't necessarily know anything except for the one(s) that it might boot. But I think there may be some extra magic in what the kernel does with the names depending on which drive bios used to boot. The stuff in /dev/disk/by-path might be useful for the versions that have it, but I can't see anything for the empty controller positions where the drives aren't connected so the arrangement doesn't make a lot of sense.

--
  Les Mikesell
   lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux