Re: Fedora too cutting edge?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jarod Wilson wrote:
> Les Mikesell wrote:
>> Ship it with a way to revert to previous behavior. If people post
>> bugzilla items and revert, you know it didn't work and you will still
>> have someone to test your next experiment.
> 
> Like jima said... I'm guessing most people simply won't bother with the bug
> report. Or ever test the new stack again for the life of the release. (Note
> that the latest F8 kernel has dv capture support for OHCI 1.0 controllers,
> while the initial release kernel does not).
> 
>>>> Agreed... At least firewire has been broken for too long (IMHO)
>> I gave up on it somewhere around FC3 and switched to the CentOSplus
>> kernel where I needed something that mostly worked.  So I'm not a good
>> tester any more.
> 
> Uhm... So you gave up on juju three releases before it existed? It didn't show
> up until F7...

Wow. I can't count. Make that four releases.

Okay, anyhow, enough of this, as Hans said, we're working on fixing things. In
the mean time, multiple 3rd-party repositories package up the old stack for
those who still need it.

/me goes back to attempting to be productive...

-- 
Jarod Wilson
jwilson@xxxxxxxxxx


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux