Re: Linux is not about choice [was Re: Fedora too cutting edge?]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2008-01-10 at 12:48 -0600, Les Mikesell wrote:
> It doesn't disambiguate the situation unless you are saying that local 
> administrators should not touch any files.  How does a (novice or not) 
> user know which files belong to him but are delivered as working 
> defaults and which will be clobbered by subsequent updates?  I thought 
> most of the point of splattering stuff under /etc/sysconfig was to have 
> a place to put distribution-tool managed bits without too much impact on 
> standard, documented config files as they would work in other distributions.

The problem is that a lot of software erroneously place files in /etc.
Ideally all files (and that should be very few files!) in /etc should be
safe to edit by the system administrator.

     David


-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux