On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 05:54:51PM -0500, David Zeuthen wrote: > > On Wed, 2008-01-09 at 23:47 +0100, Patrice Dumas wrote: > > Who 'essentially already posited that we have insufficient developer > > effort'? Who decided that, and for what task? Isn't the fedora > > contributors time used like they want to? If there are three parts, > > and three interactions but dozens of contributors willing to fix > > them where is the issue? > > One issue is that most packagers maintainers in the Fedora Project are > not code monkeys. Do you have other words that would say the same, but understandable by a non native speaker... > Another issue is that complexity has this funny habit > of growing exponentially with the number of moving parts... That's possible, and I am not advocating to let everything go in any direction, be it only because some of the burden fails on other packagers (misfiled bugs, complex issues that seems to arise from a package but in fact comes from another temporarily broken) but a middle ground is needed in which developpers, especially from the community can also do what they want in fedora to pursue their own (innovative or simply usefull). -- Pat -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
