Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
People running fedora will expect to use sysV style init configuration
to control it.
IMHO people running Fedora (and RHEL) will gladly take any well-designed
system over what exists now, and to hell with sysV style init if that
helps making a good replacement. It's all very well to perpetuate
habits, but don't overestimate the attachment people have to the current
system.
But to be better, it has to do all that the old system did and more.
Would it be able to process commands to suspend-to-ram/suspend-to-disk
with sensibly sequenced operations as well as intercept the hardware
hints that these things should be done - and likewise order the
operations as it wakes up from these states?
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
