On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 05:15:57PM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote: > John Poelstra (poelstra@xxxxxxxxxx) said: > > Most seemed to be in agreement that going forward, at the GA of each new > > release, the version of all existing rawhide bugs would be mass changed to > > the GA version. For example, for the upcoming release, open rawhide bugs > > at the time of GA we would changed to Fedora 9. This would have a few > > benefits as we go forward for each release: > > 1) encourage the closing of rawhide bugs that qualify > > 2) anchor the remaining rawhide bugs to the closest GA release so there > > is a marker in the future as to when they were reported. > > Hm, this runs afoul of things like hosted projects that use Fedora bugzilla > as essentially an upstream bug tracker. Shouldn't they be using a 'Fedora hosted' product, rather than the main 'Fedora' product (albeit with possibly the same 'component' value) Dan. -- |=- Red Hat, Engineering, Emerging Technologies, Boston. +1 978 392 2496 -=| |=- Perl modules: http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ -=| |=- Projects: http://freshmeat.net/~danielpb/ -=| |=- GnuPG: 7D3B9505 F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 -=| -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
