John Poelstra wrote:
I would say that the recent change to rawhide tag rather than devel
should have been more thorough and included a rawhide version (pre-F9)
for instance. Getting rid of the 3 different -testX versions was good,
but rawhide changes and bugs filed against it get left behind.
It was discussed on fedora-test-list at the time of the change of the
bugzilla versions.
Most seemed to be in agreement that going forward, at the GA of each new
release, the version of all existing rawhide bugs would be mass changed
to the GA version. For example, for the upcoming release, open rawhide
bugs at the time of GA we would changed to Fedora 9. This would have a
few benefits as we go forward for each release:
1) encourage the closing of rawhide bugs that qualify
2) anchor the remaining rawhide bugs to the closest GA release so
there is a marker in the future as to when they were reported.
John
I guess I missed that discussion but that would indeed fix the problem of
carrying Rawhide bugs along into next release.
--
Andrew Farris <lordmorgul@xxxxxxxxx> <ajfarris@xxxxxxxxx>
gpg 0xC99B1DF3 fingerprint CDEC 6FAD BA27 40DF 707E A2E0 F0F6 E622 C99B 1DF3
No one now has, and no one will ever again get, the big picture. - Daniel Geer
---- ----
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
