>>>>> "JJ" == Jerry James <loganjerry@xxxxxxxxx> writes: JJ> I don't know that I'm sufficiently experienced with Java packaging JJ> to be helpful, but I've had a lot of experience with JJ> pedanticalness. Surely that qualifies me for writing guidelines! JJ> :-) Yes, we on the packaging committee are positiviously ecstaticised by pedanticalosity. I guess what needs to happen, in the absence of the board persuading Red Hat management to allocate a few Java-wizard-hours, is that those who know just enough to be dangerous work on a few packages, hammer out some potentially dumb guidelines, beg for answers to the tough questions from folks who understand them. And finally, be prepared to quite possibly be flamed for making a set of bad guidelines by people who might just spend more time composing the flames than they would have spent helping us write guidelines they wouldn't have felt the need to flame. So I'll be the reviewer. I'll need two or three simple packages and one more complicated one, preferably by multiple submitters who are willing to respond to input, plus some packages already in the distro to look at. Obviously that includes at least one of yours. From there we can get a handle on what these packages need to do, where files need to go, and what rpmlint complaints come up. This is almost certainly an after-fudcon thing, unless some folks at fudcon want to sit down and bang something out. - J< -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
