On Tue, 2008-01-08 at 14:58 +0000, Andrew Haley wrote: > Do you get good performance on the local display of both boxes ? Yes, I do. No problems here. > Do you get good neatwork throughput between boxes? Yes, I do: [dimi@dimi download]$ scp mihai@shrek:~mihai/download/ipligence/worldlocations.csv.gz tmp worldlocations.csv.gz 100% 33MB 33.3MB/s 00:01 > What is the ping time betewwn boxes? [dimi@dimi download]$ ping shrek PING shrek.lattica.com (192.168.3.12) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 192.168.3.12: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.175 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.3.12: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.148 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.3.12: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.156 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.3.12: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=0.154 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.3.12: icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=0.158 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.3.12: icmp_seq=6 ttl=64 time=0.163 ms --- shrek.lattica.com ping statistics --- 6 packets transmitted, 6 received, 0% packet loss, time 4999ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.148/0.159/0.175/0.008 ms -- Dimi Paun <dimi@xxxxxxxxxxx> Lattica, Inc. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list