Paul W. Frields wrote:
> If I may be so bold, last time we did this, a very small proportion
> of attendees actually sent around signed keys. Or did they just not
> want to sign mine? :-)
I've had that experience myself. I made a note to shower before the
next keysigning.
> If you've got a laptop and install pgp-tools on it, you can run
> through the signing routine at least once in the room so we can
> clear up any confusion that might prevent propagating the "web of
> trust."
Speaking of the web, here's a graph of the keys submitted so far and
how they are related. The graph was made using the sig2dot script[1]
and neato (from graphviz).
Keys are colored:
* Red proportional to sigs received (in arrows)
* Green proportional to the ratio of sigs given to sigs received
* Blue proportional to sigs given (out arrows)
[1] http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/pool/main/s/sig2dot/sig2dot_0.37.tar.gz
--
Todd OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
It's not denial. I'm just very selective about what I accept as
reality.
-- Calvin ("Calvin and Hobbes")
Attachment:
pgpFGARYozOsM.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
