Re: Another selinux rant

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Monday 07 January 2008 15:07:24 jam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > In fairness the networked facilities need some enhancements to make them
> > fully viable. For instance the network traffic is not encrypted, a
> > critical feature when transmitting security sensitive data and it needs
> > to be fronted by a more robust authentication mechanism.
>
> my use case would be in a private network environment (call center, noc,
> etc) so the messages would not necessarily need to be encrypted.. my
> concern would be that they get to the central server reliably.

There are plans to create a remote logging plugin for the audit system. This 
will handle more traffic than just the avc's. There are a number of issues 
that have to be resolved in order for this to work correctly. I hope that it 
will be done in time for F9.

-Steve

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux