On Jan 4, 2008 4:02 AM, Caolan McNamara <caolanm@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: [...] >> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/OpenOffice.org >>>> to document the best recipe for installing and deinstalling >>>> openoffice.org extensions [...] >>>>> "RS" == Rahul Sundaram writes: RS> Packaging Committee has instructions on changing the guidelines. RS> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Committee Caolan, do you have any best practices recommendations for the naming of the openoffice.org extensions? It would be nice to add them to the guidelines (then perhaps submit them to the packaging committee) e.g., I'd like to package ooolatex: http://ooolatex.sourceforge.net/ and so should the package should (following the emacs-, python-, perl-, R- convention) be called "openoffice.org-latex"? or should be called "openoffice.org-ooolatex", or just "ooolatex"? Also, will this particular extension, which is packaged as an .oxt file, be able to be installed using the unopkg tool as suggested on that page? i.e. are .oxt files intended to be installed using the unopkg tool? Any suggestions welcomed. Alex -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
