On 05/01/2008, Patrice Dumas <pertusus@xxxxxxx> wrote: > Hello, > > There are packages that are shipped part of texlive, though texlive is > not the upstream for those packages. Among those, some are in fedora > texlive, as an exception because they were in tetex previously. > I personally don't want to maintain them since I maintain enough > packages already, but I can review them. > > > In texlive but should be separate: > xdvik (xdvi) > http://sourceforge.net/projects/xdvi > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427667 This package builds on F8, but still needs a fair bit of work, and is not yet review ready. However, I wanted to get it out in the open early to get feedback. Would welcome all and any hep. What I have done: * Sun Jan 6 2008 Jonathan G. Underwood <jonathan.underwood@xxxxxxxxx> - 22.84.13-1 - Initial package based on the texlive.spec by Jindrich Novy - Updated to latest upstream xdvik and Japanese xdvik - Reviewed all patches relating to xdvi in texlive.spec and cherry picked those that are still needed - Reworked the patch to allow building of xdvik and pxdvik What still needs to be done: Currently this builds against the bundled kpathsea library sources in the tarball. We should be building against the kpathsea(-devel) packages instead. Lots of missing Requires and BuildRequires. Needs building in Mock for devel and rpmlint checking. And testing lots. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
