On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 12:24:51PM +0000, Caolan McNamara wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2008-01-05 at 16:24 -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > >>>>> "CM" == Caolan McNamara <caolanm@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> >
> > CM> So, what exactly is the current problem with these two ? Is it
> > CM> just the mysterious failure of TeX to execute some stuff, i.e.
> >
> > Yes, I debugged this the other day. The problem for bacula is that
> > latex2html somehow does not properly run texhash in %post, so nothing
> > can find html.sty. If you force a texhash it works. Changing the
> > post scriptlet for latex2html to not use "/usr/bin/env -
> > /usr/bin/texhash" but to just call texhash directly works. I don't
> > know why.
>
> I see that another tex package e.g. jadetex has a comment about
> "use texconfig-sys rehash instead of texhash", and the change was...
>
> %post
> -/usr/bin/env - PATH=$PATH:%{TeXdir}/bin texhash > /dev/null 2>&1
> +[ -x %{_bindir}/texconfig-sys ] && %{_bindir}/texconfig-sys rehash
> 2> /dev/null || :
>
> +%postun
> +[ -x %{_bindir}/texconfig-sys ] && %{_bindir}/texconfig-sys rehash
> 2> /dev/null || :
> +
>
> So maybe a determination of the right way to rehash is called for and
> consistent usage might clear this up ?
>
Yes, running rehashing of the kpathsea's ls-R files via texconfig-sys
as noted above shouldn't break anything and should correctly call
mktexlsr to regenerate ls-Rs. I actually suggested it to Ondrej while
fixing the jadetex and iproute build.
Jindrich
--
Jindrich Novy <jnovy@xxxxxxxxxx> http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
