Alex Lancaster wrote: >>>>>> "KF" == Kevin Fenzi writes: > > KF> On Wed, 02 Jan 2008 11:01:20 +0100 > KF> mmaslano@xxxxxxxxxx (Marcela Maslanova) wrote: > >> New tcl and tk 8.5 was released. I'd like to push it to rawhide as >>> soon as possible. The list of dependent packages could be found in >>> this draft: >>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MarcelaMaslanova/Draft/tcl8.5 The >>> maintainers of dependent packages should fix them according to >>> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Tcl > > KF> Can you possibly mail directly at least the primary maintainers of > KF> these packages and let them know when you are going to push the > KF> update? > > KF> Many of them might not see this post... > > Marcela, > > Can you also post to fedora-devel-announce to get wider distribution? > Judging by the high number of broken deps still in rawhide caused by > this tcl soname bump, I suspect that many maintainers may not have > seen this announcement. Many only subscribe to the -announce list and > not devel-list to avoid the high traffic here. (These kind of > distro-wide soname bumps that affect many packages should always be > posted to fedora-announce). > > Also, I've noticed that several packages don't rebuild with the new > Tcl and have build failures with the following: > > /usr/include/tcl-private/generic/tclPort.h:27:28: error: tclUnixPort.h: No such file or directory > > (one example full log is here: > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=326763&name=build.log) > > is there any easy fix? "-I/usr/include/tcl-private/unix" is missing from the compile line. The tcl-devel package should probably make symlinks from the files in %{_includedir}/tcl-private/unix/*.h to %{_includedir}/tcl-private/generic/ so that the extensions don't notice that the headers moved to a different subdirectory. --Mike -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
