On Sat, 5 Jan 2008 10:29:05 +0000 (UTC) Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I'd do things in the following order: > 1. package required build-time dependencies > 2. package required run-time dependencies > 3. package as many optional build-time dependencies as possible > 4. package SAGE itself > 5. package optional run-time dependencies (and decide on a case by case basis > whether it makes sense to add them as actual Requires: dependencies to the > package or not) Sounds good to me. Would be cool to make a wiki page with these things and let people assign themselves to the packages that are not handled yet... > I think we could really use a Mathematics SIG. Count me as interested (I'm a > PhD student in Mathematics). I think Rex Dieter is likely to be interested > too as he's working as a sysadmin for the Department of Mathematics at UNL. > (Of course we're both already very busy with KDE SIG matters though. ;-) ) > And as the interest in this thread is showing, there's probably more > potentially interested folks. :-) +1 - Andreas -- Andreas Bierfert, B.Sc. | http://awbsworld.de | GPG: C58CF1CB andreas.bierfert@xxxxxxxxxxxxx | http://lowlatency.de | signed/encrypted phone: +49 2402 102373 | cell: +49 173 5803043 | mail preferred
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
