On Fri, 2008-01-04 at 12:36 +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Thu, 3 Jan 2008, John Dennis wrote: > > > auditd is the general auditing facility, SELinux messages are just one of the > > possible auditing messages. > > But on a Fedora default install SELinux is the only thing using and > requiring it, right? No, think of it more like a different logging protocol. If you want to get rid of "Yet another daemon" the best method would be to add audit input support to the rsyslogd package. > > setroubleshootd is a diagnostic tool. If SELinux is completely disabled the > > daemon exits if started. > > OK, should it have "# hide: true" in /etc/init.d/setroubleshootd so it > doesn't even turn up in system-config-services? > > > Allowing > > the daemon to decide if it should run or exit is more robust than some > > utility which thinks it knows if something should be chkconfig'ed on or not > > because it will almost certainly get that answer wrong. > > Then all these smart daemons should have "# hide : true" in their > respective /etc/init.d/foo script so avoid being managed by the smart > utility system-config-services, am I right? This means people can't stop the service, why do you want to do that? Nothing "bad" happens if you stop any of these. -- James Antill <james.antill@xxxxxxxxxx> Red Hat
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
