On Thu, 3 Jan 2008 08:30:14 -0500 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 07:11:33AM -0600, Josh Boyer wrote: > > On Thu, 3 Jan 2008 07:02:42 -0500 > > Jakub Jelinek <jakub@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > fails-even-with-41/powerpc-utils-1.0.6-2.fc9.log > error: Architecture is not included: x86_64 > > > fails-even-with-41/powerpc-utils-papr-1.0.4-2.fc9.log > DEBUG util.py:260: No Package Found for librtas-devel > (but has ExclusiveArch: ppc ppc64 anyway, so even if librtas-devel was > included, it would fail to build anyway). > > > fails-even-with-41/ppc64-utils-0.14-1.fc9.log > error: Architecture is not included: x86_64 > > > fails-even-with-41/ps3pf-utils-2.1-1.fc9.log > error: Architecture is not included: x86_64 > > > These seem like bogus results. Looking at the logs, you might have hit > > some mock/builder problems that were being seen a while ago. > > I said that fails-even-with-41 includes even ExcludeArched packages > and that the build was on x86_64. As for me fails-even-with-41 > category is DONTCARE, I haven't spent time to categorize them further. Ok, fair enough. I just did scratch builds on the gcc43 tag for all three and they built fine. You can take them off your list. josh -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list