On Wed, 2008-01-02 at 18:05 +0100, Emmanuel Seyman wrote: > * Brian Pepple [02/01/2008 17:59] : > > > > FESCo discussed this back at our last meeting, but before we pulled the > > trigger on this, I want to get feedback from the mailing list. I'm > > tentatively planning on having FESCo vote on this at the 2008-01-10 > > meeting, though that could change based on any feedback I receive. > > Should upstream be informed/consulted/given-veto-power ? I think it probably makes sense to have a good dialog with upstream (which applies with all packages, not just compat), but I'm not sure if it's necessary to formally require that upstream be consulted when proposing a compat package. /B -- Brian Pepple <bpepple@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BrianPepple gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
