On Fri, 2007-12-28 at 19:12 +0100, Valent Turkovic wrote: > On 12/28/07, John (J5) Palmieri <johnp@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Fri, 2007-12-28 at 19:00 +0100, Valent Turkovic wrote: > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=315151 > > > > > > Please consider this for Fedora 9 Live CD... > > > > > > Valent. > > > > > > -- > > > http://kernelreloaded.blog385.com/ > > > linux, blog, anime, spirituality, windsurf, wireless > > > registered as user #367004 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org. > > > ICQ: 2125241, Skype: valent.turkovic > > > > While I agree this is useful it is something that should be filed > > upstream and fixed in nautilus-cd-burner. It would be pretty easy to > > implement. > > Well at least until upstream doesn't fix this issue there isn't a > reason why fedora users should "suffer" because of that, is it? That is not how things work. Red Hat Fedora only has a subset of upstream developers. In some projects we may be the main developers and others we may have no developers at all. If the bug (like the one you filed bellow) has to do with integrating functionality in upstream releases into Fedora then it is best to file in Fedora. In fact Fedora is a good first place to file things. However if the functionality is something that would benefit from a larger developer base looking at it, we will recommend you file it upstream as given the amount of work Fedora developers have they might not have time to get to it. > Please also consider this RFE which can be easily fixed, but still in > F8 it is not: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=315141 I looked at this and wrote a comment. The gist of it is that this functionality exists and is easy to turn on but is turned off by default, most likely for good reasons. -- John (J5) Palmieri <johnp@xxxxxxxxxx> -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
