dragonauta x writes: > I give up... > (to resume: moto4lin doesn't work well with +2 drives, but SVN version does) > This is what I got on bugzilla: > "I'm sorry, but this is still an upstream issue. The fact that the upstream > author has a patch that fixes this problem but is not releasing it in an > official release does not make this a packaging issues, IMHO. > > It is my position that bugs like this need to be fixed by an upstream > release, > particularly in cases like this. Because upstream fixes help all > distributions, > and Fedora, effectively, forking it does not. > > I don't believe it is Fedora's place to be tracking svn. Does the upstream > maintainer have a good reason for not having a real release that fixes this? > > If someone from fedora-devel thinks this should be tracking SVN, they should > re-open this and take assignment on the bug." > > Thanks anyway. I don't get it. Where's the problem? Upstream refuses to produce an update? Andrew. -- Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SL4 1TE, UK Registered in England and Wales No. 3798903 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
