On Wed, 2007-12-26 at 23:44 +0100, dragonauta x wrote: > Thanks Jonathan, I did reported in bugzilla > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426667 > and they told me to contact the author... so > the author told to use the svn version... > > In Argentina we say: "nobody holds hot potatos" > Seems like nobody wants to solve this... > Anyone who knows were should I post this? > > thanks again for your invaluable time > -- > .:: www.preguntaslinux.org :: moderador ::. > -- Hi, I think you should say in the report in bugzilla that you contacted the author and he that he suggested using svn version and that you tried it and it work and suggest in the bug to either backport some patches from the svn version (if anyone is able to track which changes in code fixes the behaviour) or upgrading to svn snapshot completely. Martin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
