KH KH píše v Po 24. 12. 2007 v 15:35 +0100: > 2007/12/24, Dan Horák <dan@xxxxxxxx>: > > > > Dan Horák píše v Ne 23. 12. 2007 v 23:13 +0100: > > > KH KH píše v Ne 23. 12. 2007 v 22:54 +0100: > > > > 2007/12/23, Frank Büttner <frank-buettner@xxxxxxx>: > > > > > Hello, > > > > > can filezilla be released for EPEL? > > > > Hello > > > > No, unless the requested BuildRequirement can be provided. (needs wxGTK 2.8.x) > > > > Actually even rawhide cannot provides the necessary BuildRequirement > > > > for the last FileZilla. (3.0.4 - needs wxGTK 2.8.6) so I've backported > > > > some patches so we can build the last 3.0.2.1 (needs wxGTK 2.8.3) with > > > > theses additional patches... > > > > > > > > As soon as it will be possible, I will request a EPEL-5 branch for > > > > FileZilla. But i would say, it does not make sense for now. > > > > Alternatively, it could be possible to build it with a statically > > > > compiled wxGTK... > > > > > > > > I will check further next week... > > > > > > We are working on the inclusion of wxGTK into EPEL-4. I will be > > > responsible for EPEL and Matthew for Fedora. So stay tuned :-) > > > > wxGTK 2.8.4 was just built for EPEL-4 and is available on the build > > system, tested with a rebuild of codeblocks > Ok, so what about EPEL-5 ? I didn't checked the wxGTK version available here. > Anyway i will request branches for EL-4 and EL-5 then ... wxGTK already exists in EPEL-5 > I will probably backport others patches and do quick testing... Then > maybe it will be avaible in a week or two... > > Can we have wxGTK updated for rawhide or are we waiting for something else ? I could prepare the update during the next few days. Dan -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
