On Thu, 2007-12-20 at 09:22 +0100, Martin Stransky wrote: [snip] > If you're a package maintainer and your package already uses xulrunner, > please rebuild it against the new rawhide version. Xulrunner directory > has been changed and many gecko packages (if not all) are linked with > --rpath linker directive. As long as rpath is used you have to rebuild > gecko-libs based packages after each xulrunner change so please consider > to remove it. Gecko libraries are registered system wide by > /etc/ld.so.conf.d and rpath should not be necessary in rawhide. But isn't it the case that the libraries in question do not have soversions? If the rpath is eliminated, how do we know when things really *do* need to break? -- Braden McDaniel e-mail: <braden@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <http://endoframe.com> Jabber: <braden@xxxxxxxxxx> -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
