> I totally agree with them regarding Fedora 8 graphics look, and the > wallpaper. No matter what you say but users judge desktops on how they > look. You could argue with Fedora 7 looks vs Fedora Core 6 looks if > you like one more that the other regarding your personal taste, but > Fedora 8 wallpaper and complete look it really beneath the previously > high quality standards brought by FC6 and F7. Heh I hate to tell you but all art is subjective, and so Fedora 8's wallpaper and complete look are both subjective as well :p Take for example: Distrowatch on Fedora: "Its new artwork team in particular deserves high marks for its work..." and a few comments from the digg story about Fedora 8's artwork: "This **** is great! I want Fedora!" "this is much better than the current hot air balloons, thanks!" I'm sure there are just as many negative opinions out there - but it is subjective!! The same goes for the rest of this review: for every thing they commented on as being negative and not working, another review has commented on as being positive and working brilliantly! Of course, I agree with everything Jef said, if they want to point out something that's not working, by all means do it, but do it in a way that helps it get fixed!! Otherwise, why bother working in a field where openness and collaboration are the central points?! Jef, I think we should try and get your e-mail somewhere where reviewers are actually going to see it... Best, Jon -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
