On Fri, 2007-12-21 at 10:53 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Fri, 21 Dec 2007 10:12:43 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > > But On the other hand I agree that there are many rushed/untested updates. > > All I wish is that we don't throw away the results of the development > cycle so carelessly: our choice of what components we add together to > build packages, the testing, the freeze. Yeah, we push *way* too many updates and too casually. In my own view an update should fix a clearly identified common crasher or some other serious problem, but definitely not just because a new version of a package appeared upstream. i.e. consider Fedora 8 as finished, done, dusted and only reluctantly update it due to necessity. Of course one OOo security/crasher update probably equals nearly everything else pushed as updates put together ;-) so I probably shouldn't comment. C. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
