Re: PackageACLOpening and NewMaintainerContainment Re: Plan for tomorrows (20071220) FESCO meeting

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 20.12.2007 16:24, Brian Pepple wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-12-20 at 15:54 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>> You mean
>> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Development/FescoProposalTemplate ?
>>
>> No, looks fine and certainly is helpful for those that want to be
>> guided. But sometimes it might be easier for people to say it in
>> different ways, and that should be allowed. And a problem I fear a lot
>> is this:
>> Contributer: "I want to do foo, to do bar"
>> FESCo: "Please use the template"
>> Contributer: "But foo is self-explaining. Why do I have to write such a
>> lengthy proposal? I have no time for such crap."
>> End result: nothing gets done.
> That is why the proposal template isn't mandatory, merely suggested.

I didn't say otherwise. I made the "I have something self-explaining
that should be corrected without writing a proposal"-experience with
another committee in Fedora-land ;-)

Cu
knurd

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux