Re: how is pulseaudio supposed to work?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2007-12-19 at 11:31 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Wed, 19.12.07 12:12, Neil Thompson (abraxis@xxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> 
> > > Also, I'd argue even if it worked before (which it didn't) the
> > > behaviour exposed by PA+CK is the more correct one, from a security
> > > perspective. And hence speaking of a "regression" in this area is very
> > > adventurous.
> > > 
> > 
> > Something that used to work without issues, doesn't any more...looks like
> > a duck, walks like a duck...
> 
> Sorry, but it *didn't* work before. 
> 
> By default the access mode of the dmix SHM is 0600. i.e. only a single
> user ID may access the sound card at a time.

Lennart,
I am ok with the answers you gave, but here I can't agree with you.

Previous behavior:
user A play music, F-U-S, music keep playing.

PA scenario:
user A play music, F-U-S, music stop playing.

I understand it make sense that the new scenario is the default for
security reasons, I agree, but don't say there is no difference.

> If you want to open up dmix to multiple users at the same time you
> need to change it to 0666 or so, which is a security hole and needs
> some non-trivial reconfiguration.

Only if you have a mic, common on laptops, uncommon on desktops (just my
2c)

> The reconfiguration necessary to open up PA to other users is a lot
> simpler to do. Just copy a cookie file around.

This require knowledge that is beyond normal users, if this is something
users are expected to do, then a simple configuration dialog should be
provided.

> > And then the use case just gets dismissed.  Paraphrasing..."the clueless newbie
> > who doesn't really use her machine will be OK, and the other folks will just have
> > to change the way they work".
> 
> I didn't dismiss your use case at all. All I told you is that the kind
> of setup you envision required non-trivial reconfiguration before, and
> it requires reconfiguration now. So, calling this is a regression is
> bogus. 

And yet it would be nice to make it possible to have the 2 major use
cases working easily:
A) Only the active session have access to sound
B) Everybody have access to sound

A big switch in the sound configuration window is all is needed
(including scary warnings about the insecurity of option B).

Simo.

-- 
| Simo S Sorce |
| Sr.Soft.Eng. |
| Red Hat, Inc |
| New York, NY |

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux