On Sat, 2007-12-15 at 13:43 +0100, Debarshi 'Rishi' Ray wrote: > I propose to rename the anjuta-gdl package to lbgdl. > > The prefix anjuta- seems to imply that the package is dependent on the > main anjuta (owned by me) package , which is not the case. In fact, it > is the other way round. Even then, it is not anjuta specific and being > the GNOME Devtools Library which can be used by other applications > also. > > Currently the gnome-python2-gdl (owned by Matthew Barnes) package > provides Python bindings to this library, and would be affected by > this change. The gnome-build (previously held by Paul F. Johnson) > package also depends on anjuta-gdl. > > $ repoquery --repoid development --alldeps --whatrequires anjuta-gdl > gnome-build-0:0.1.4-2.fc7.x86_64 > anjuta-gdl-devel-0:0.7.3-2.fc9.x86_64 > anjuta-gdl-0:0.7.3-2.fc9.i386 > gnome-build-0:0.1.4-2.fc7.i386 > anjuta-1:2.2.0-4.fc9.i386 > anjuta-1:2.2.0-4.fc9.x86_64 > gnome-python2-gdl-0:2.19.1-12.fc9.x86_64 > anjuta-gdl-devel-0:0.7.3-2.fc9.i386 > anjuta-gdl-0:0.7.3-2.fc9.x86_64 > > The %changelog tells us that the name anjuta-gdl was chosen instead of > gdl since there already exists a package called gdl. Debian and Ubuntu > call it libgdl. > > Comments? > > Cheers, > Debarshi +1 for this. I always wondered why it is named anjuta-gdl while libgdl seems better name for it, and as a matter of fact I had around 'libgdl' (I was well aware of the name clash with gdl) package of mine when the review request was on progress. But at that time I wasn't fedora contributor, so I didn't comment on the name... Martin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
