Re: RFC for Smolt features

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 23:05 -0500, Yaakov Nemoy wrote:
> After thinking it over, I've decided that having a Privacy Policy for
> Smolt would be a great experiment as a community process.  The rules
> are pretty simple.  Mike McGrath is a BDFL (That is not a Braised Duck
> avec Foie gras sous Liqueur', as tasty as it might sound.)  Decisions
> tend to get made by the people coding, but we are looking for input to
> see what people want out of Smolt.  This way, we know what kind of
> information gathering is desired, and which kinds are considered too
> invasive.

I was recently wishing Smolt collected more detailed CPU information.
This would basically consist of collecting the flags: line
in /proc/cpuinfo. Personally I'd like to know how many machines have
cmov, sse and sse2. This would mostly be unique to i386, x86_64 is
always going to have them, and PPC doesn't even have a flags: line...

Also, the ram/swap/cpu mhz graphs on the web site are IMHO too coarse to
be very useful.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux