Re: yum, x86_64 and i386: the never ending story

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/12/2007, Yaakov Nemoy <loupgaroublond@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Dec 11, 2007 7:51 PM, seth vidal <skvidal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 01:31 +0100, Christoph Wickert wrote:
> > > To me this looks like xfprint.i386 and Thunar.i386 are installed by
> > > accident and then pull in the all the rest. Can anybody explain this to
> > > me?
> > >
> > > I don't think that this behavior is desired by 99 % of the users.
> >
> > I'm pretty sure that that statistic is made up.
>
> 88.3% of all statistics are made up on the spot.
>

So it's all spot's fault.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux