On Thu, 2007-12-06 at 16:37 -0500, seth vidal wrote: > On Thu, 2007-12-06 at 16:32 -0500, Dr. Diesel wrote: > > > > Is this a packaging error on Livna's part or some new policy I missed? > > > > it was a yum bug and it is fixed in yum 3.2.8 which is out in > updates. :) We've probably talked about this before but.. how hard would it be to change yum to update itself (and its deps) before attempting the rest of the transaction, for simple updates? There've been a lot of bugs lately where "update yum before updating everything else" was the solution. Seems like that would be the Right Thing To Do in general. -w
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
