Re: inotify-aware tail replacement

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Colin Walters (walters@xxxxxxxxxx) said: 
> On Thu, 2007-12-06 at 21:49 +0100, Karel Zak wrote:
> 
> >  coreutils = portability; inotify = linux (>= 2.6.13)
> 
> We have SELinux support in coreutils, I don't really see why an inotify
> patch would be a problem.
> 
> Having a separate program just because there's a different
> implementation detail is silly.

Is there any reason the user should *care* about the implementation
of tail -f?

Bill

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux