Re: BIND will completely drop D-BUS dynamic forwarders table support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2007-12-05 at 15:16 -0800, Roland McGrath wrote:
> > I think this was one argument against using nscd exclusively and moving
> > to a caching nameserver, because /etc/resolv.conf can't support split
> > DNS.  How does one do split DNS with nscd?
> 
> It doesn't do that.  nscd -i is just a simple idea for making resolv.conf
> reloading easy.  A fancy solution with a local DNS server of some variety
> is better if it has nice configuration features.  

As VPN is fairly common these days on desktops; any chance that nscd can
grow such an interface? It really doesn't have to be more complicated
than, for example, NetworkManager poking it to say "for *.redhat.com use
these nameservers".

Running a full DNS server on a simple desktop seems like, well, a lot of
overhead not to mention security concerns...

      David


-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux