Jesse Keating wrote:
> To me this looks like you have to opt /in/ to Cvsextras Commits, and
> I'm not sure what will happen if you don't fill in a value.
>
> Could we word it in such a way that as a requester you'd have to
> explicitly opt out of of having open acls.
>
> I don't have suggested phrasing in mind just yet, but I wondered if
> folks were open to the change.
I think open by default is reasonable. For those packages that want
tighter control perhaps "Private Commits" would be good wording.
--
Todd OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Rowe's Rule: The odds are five to six that the light at the end of the
tunnel is the headlight of an oncoming train.
-- Paul Dickson
Attachment:
pgpNgBddtRBc9.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
