On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 09:29:27PM +0100, Patrice Dumas wrote: > On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 05:27:02PM +0000, Jonathan Underwood wrote: > > On 03/12/2007, Jindrich Novy <jnovy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > I come with good news for TeX users in Fedora. TeXLive is now finally > > > imported and built in rawhide since today. > > > > > > Enjoy, > > > Jindrich > > > > Jindrich, many thanks for this, looking at the spec files, one can > > really appreciate what a monumental packaging feat this is. > > > > Is the plan to keep tetex in rawhide for a transitional period? Moving > > to TeXlive means some packaging renaming (did that tex-foo guideline > > ever get past the packaging committee?) and some adjusting of > > Yes, the tex-foo naming is now the guideline. But I think that the > package renaming issue is orthogonal to the tex dependencies issues. > > > BuildRequires and Requires. (and some Obsoletes and Provides too). > > Texlive Provides and Obsoletes tetex, so it seems to me that, currently > requiring tetex is still right. Once/if the virtual provides, like TeX and > LaTeX are added (Jindrich was ok with that) it will become better to > switch to that provide, in my opinion, for new stuff, and make sure that > it is in RHEL 6 for EPEL. > Could you please file a bz so that we can track completion of the pure TeX/LaTeX/etc. virtual provides in TeXLive? Thanks, Jindrich -- Jindrich Novy <jnovy@xxxxxxxxxx> http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/ -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
