On Mon, 2007-12-03 at 16:19 -0600, Callum Lerwick wrote: > On Mon, 2007-12-03 at 13:32 +0100, Matej Cepl wrote: > > Which was the reason I was shocked DJB released qmail under public domain > > and why I would always prefer at least MIT/X/BSD-no-appropriation/CC-au > > always. IIRC, sqlite is the only substantial software which is under > > public domain and there is a reason for that. > > IANAL, but doesn't this mean he's effectively released it under *every* > license ever written? :) Are we going to have GPL and BSD forks battling > it out now? Its possible, but Public Domain means something closer to "no license" than "every license". We could see forks battling it out, but somehow, I doubt this will happen. ~spot -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
